CYBERSAFEHAVEN · CYBER RISK ADVISORY

Who Owns Your Cyber Risk?

Cybersecurity decisions rarely fail because an organization has no technology. More often, the challenge is knowing what actually needs attention, which risks matter to the business, where security investment should go, and how to turn it all into a program people can execute. We help you answer each of those with clarity.

Business · Technical · Risk · Compliance

That takes security leadership that moves between business priorities, technical realities, risk, and compliance without losing sight of any of them.

That is the leadership CyberSafeHaven brings. Our advisory work is built around four questions we work through alongside your leadership team.

The Ownership Gap in Numbers

Cyber risk is only managed when someone owns it. The latest research shows where boards and security leaders are still out of step.

The board–CISO gap

Updates are regular. Confidence is not.

CISOs who deliver regular updates to their board
95%
Boards that describe the CISO relationship as strong and collaborative
30%
Directors who rate cyber updates “very effective”
29%

In the same research, 41% of directors said reporting on cyber business risk assessment needs improvement, and only 6% rated it excellent.

IANS Research, Artico Search and The CAP Group, 2026 CISO-Board Engagement Report Report summary ↗ Findings ↗
Boards are bringing in structure

Fortune 100 disclosures, 2019 vs 2025

Use of an external independent advisor
2019
14%
2025
99%
Alignment with an external framework or standard
2019
4%
2025
73%
Cybersecurity expertise sought on the board or cited in a director biography
2019
53%
2025
86%
EY analysis of 80 Fortune 100 companies, published in the NACD–ISA Director's Handbook on Cyber-Risk Oversight NACD ↗ EY ↗
Third-party risk
48%

of breaches involved a third party, up from 30% a year earlier. Someone has to own vendor risk.

Verizon, 2026 Data Breach Investigations Report Source ↗
How boards are responding
Increased interactions with the CISO
58%
Clarified escalation protocols for significant incidents
44%
Increased cyber-related education for directors
42%

Share of directors reporting each change over the past year.

PwC, 2026 Annual Corporate Directors Survey Source ↗

What the Experts Say

“Not as something the IT people worry about.”

Speaking to the Economic Club of New York in 2023, she said CEOs and board members must embrace corporate cyber responsibility as a matter of good governance.

Why it matters: Ownership of cyber risk sits with leadership. Our advisory work helps leadership exercise it.

JE
Jen Easterly
Former Director, U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)
Cybersecurity Dive Source ↗
“The greatest threat to every profession, every industry, every company in the world.”

Her description of cybercrime at the 2015 IBM Security Summit in New York City.

Why it matters: No sector is exempt, so risk ownership cannot be delegated away from the top.

GR
Ginni Rometty
Then Chairman, President and CEO of IBM
CSO Online Source ↗

Do You Know Where You Stand?

Cyber Risk / Posture Assessment

A security assessment should be more than a list of vulnerabilities and missing controls. Our Cyber Risk / Posture Assessment looks across your controls, processes, technology, governance, and risk exposure to show where you stand and where meaningful gaps exist.

We turn scattered findings into a clear understanding of risk and priority.

Who's involved
Our assessment team works directly with your security, IT, and risk stakeholders.
What sets it apart
It's a point-in-time diagnostic. It shows where you stand today, and we take it from there through Cybersecurity Program Development and CyberRisk4Board.
Best when
Before a major initiative, or when leadership needs a confident, current answer to “how exposed are we?”
Includes
Review of controls, processes, and technologyGovernance reviewRisk exposure mappingGap identificationRisk-rated findings summary
Scope
A snapshot, not ongoing monitoring. Findings feed directly into program development.
Want help putting this advice into practice? Contact Us →

What Should You Fix First?

Cybersecurity Program Development

Knowing the gaps is only useful with a plan. Our Cybersecurity Program Development turns findings into a practical security roadmap, connecting priorities, initiatives, ownership, and implementation, so security grows as a structured program instead of a collection of disconnected activities.

Who's involved
We work with your security leadership (a CISO or equivalent) and the teams that will own execution.
What sets it apart
It's the “what to do about it” layer, built between diagnosis and board communication.
Best when
Gaps have no clear owner or sequence, or security work exists only as disconnected projects.
Includes
Initiative planning and sequencingOwnership assignmentPhased implementation roadmapProgram structure
Scope
We build the program, and your organization commits the capacity to execute it.

Can You Explain Cyber Risk to the Business?

CyberRisk4Board

Cybersecurity eventually reaches the boardroom.

CyberRisk4Board, our proprietary solution, translates technical findings into business impact, risk, priorities, and decisions leadership can act on. It gives decision-makers a clear view of where the organization stands and where attention is required.

Learn more about CyberRisk4Board ↗

Who's involved
We work directly with your security leadership to prepare materials, and we might participate in board or executive sessions directly.
What sets it apart
It's a translation layer. It turns what's already known into language the business can act on.
Best when
Ahead of board meetings, budget cycles, or audits, or after an incident.
Includes
Business-impact framingRisk narratives tied to business decisionsBoard-ready materialsSupport in the room
Scope
Communication and framing, built on the findings that feed it.
Want help putting this advice into practice? Contact Us →

Are Security and Compliance Moving Together?

Compliance and/or Framework Alignment

Frameworks and regulations provide useful structure, but alignment shouldn't become a checkbox exercise. Our Compliance and/or Framework Alignment connects your security practices with the requirements that apply to you, keeping the focus on managing actual risk and improving the security program.

Who's involved
We work with your compliance, legal, and security teams.
What sets it apart
It's anchored to external requirements, where Posture Assessment is open-ended.
Best when
A framework or regulation applies or will soon apply, before an audit, or when compliance and security have drifted apart.
Includes
Framework mappingGap identification against requirementsAlignment recommendationsOngoing-fit guidance
Scope
Bounded by the framework in question. Compliance doesn't guarantee security, so we treat it as one part of the picture.

Standards Worth Knowing

Each of these maps directly to a service on this page.

NISTFebruary 2024

Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0

Adds a Govern function covering strategy, roles and responsibilities, policy, oversight and supply chain risk. Current and Target Profiles describe where you are and where you need to be, and the gap becomes the roadmap.

Maps toPosture AssessmentProgram DevelopmentCyberRisk4Board
Official source ↗
ISO/IEC2022

ISO/IEC 27005:2022, Guidance on managing information security risks

A structured approach to identifying, assessing and treating information security risks, supporting an information security management system built on ISO/IEC 27001.

Maps toPosture Assessment
Official source ↗
ISO/IEC2022

ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information security management systems: requirements

The international standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system. A common anchor when aligning security practices to a framework.

Maps toCompliance & Framework AlignmentProgram Development
Official source ↗
SEC26 July 2023

Cybersecurity risk management, strategy, governance and incident disclosure rules

Public companies must disclose material cybersecurity incidents on Form 8-K Item 1.05, generally within four business days of determining materiality, and describe risk management and board oversight annually under Regulation S-K Item 106. Applies to SEC registrants.

Maps toCyberRisk4BoardCompliance & Framework Alignment
SEC press release ↗
NACD · ISA2026

Director's Handbook on Cyber-Risk Oversight (fifth edition)

Board-level guidance with a toolkit that includes board-level cybersecurity metrics and building the relationship between the board and the CISO. A practical reference for what directors should ask.

Maps toCyberRisk4Board
Handbook ↗

Frequently Asked Questions

Who owns cyber risk in an organization?

It's shared across leadership, technical teams, and the business. We help define who owns what, so priorities, initiatives, and accountability are explicit.

Where do we start if we don't know our current posture?

With a Cyber Risk / Posture Assessment. It shows where you stand and where the meaningful gaps are.

What is CyberRisk4Board?

CyberRisk4Board is our proprietary solution for translating technical findings into business impact, risk, and decisions that boards and executives can act on.

Do we need all four services?

No. Each one stands on its own, and they work best together: findings guide the program, and the program and findings shape what the board sees.

How do you keep compliance from becoming a checkbox exercise?

We connect framework requirements to your actual risk, so alignment improves the security program instead of just producing documentation.

CyberSafeHaven

Our goal is not simply to produce another assessment or compliance report. It is to give your organization clear direction, informed decision-making, and a practical path to continuously improve its security posture.

CyberSafeHaven provides the security leadership and expertise to connect risk, strategy, governance, and execution.

We work across leadership and technical teams to understand your current posture, identify priorities, develop the security program, and guide its implementation.

CYBERSAFEHAVEN · CYBER RISK ADVISORY